Question of the Month
Feb 09
May 09
June 09
Aug 09
Sept 09
Oct 09
Nov 09
Dec 09
Jan. 2010
Feb. 2010
Mar. 2010
May 2010
 

Main Menu
Home
Brochure
Sandy, The Smart Saver
Employee Planning
Welcome Employers
Newsletter Archive
Workshops
Question of the Month  Archive

313 Blackstone Avenue
Ithaca, New York 14850
607-255-4405

Email

 

 

Question Of The Month – Febuary,  2009

Which Would You Choose:  Something That Is Guaranteed – Something That Is Probable – Something That Is Possible?

If you were looking for an efficient way to reach a goal ---- lose some weight, become more efficient in your profession, obtain a college – graduate degree, become a better parent, learn how to garden ---- how would you go about accomplishing your task?

You could do some research and look at  ---  try a number of approaches --- some that might work, some that might not --- some you would quickly dispose of --- some that have possibilities --- some that don’t.

Paul Merriman of FundAdvice.com provides an interesting perspective when he proposes looking at investing from three possible choices. 

You Have Three Choices When You Invest. 

Choice #1: Some things are guaranteed ----------Conservative

Guarantee:  Assurance that something will be done as specified (Webster Dictionary).  The return you get on a certificate of deposit or a Treasury security is one example. Investors who require certainty can get it, but at a very costly price. When the bank guarantees what it will pay on a CD, it assumes all the risk. In return for that, the bank promises to pay a very low interest rate.

Choice #2: Some Things Are Probable Though Not Guaranteed ------Moderately Conservative

Probable:  Likely to be or become true or real (Webster Dictionary).  One example is the notion that stock funds will outperform bond funds in the future. There will always be periods in which the opposite occurs. But if history is any guide, its more likely than not --- that over long periods that stock funds will outperform bond funds.  Research indicates that over long periods of time, stocks have returned about 6 - 7% above the rate of inflation – bonds about 2 – 3%. 

Choice #3: Some Things Are Possible, Although Not Probable ---------- Aggressive

Possible:  Being something that may or may not occur (Webster Dictionary).  One example is that the stock you read about or that is recommended to you by somebody you know will turn out to be the next Microsoft.  In fact there is probably some relatively small, relatively new company on the market right now that, 10 or 20 years from now, will be an industrial giant. But out of 5,000 or so possible candidates, will you be lucky enough to spot that one future gem. 

How should you  make you investment decisions?   Some experts say that Choice #2 is the best one -Some Things Are Probable Though Not Guaranteed. Make your investment decisions based on what is probable, not what is possible.  From 1995 through 1999, the Standard and Poors 500 Index compounded at a rate of 28.5% a year.  Plenty of investors concluded that successful investing was pretty easy --- returns of 75% were possible.  However, the bear market of 2000 2003 showed us that 75% losses were equally possible.

We have data from three quarters of a century (75 years) of history to show us what is probable.     According to Ibbotson Associates, a leading authority on asset allocation, large-company stocks returned 10.4%, compounded annually from 1926 through 2005.  Small-company stocks provided a return of 12.4 percent.  This look at reality --- and not the flash-in-the-pan excitement of a bull market----that should be the basis of your planning.  When you invest in that manner, you will have probability working for you, not against you

Jeremy Siegel, Professor of Finance at Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, and author of "Stocks for the Long Run" (1998), shows us what is probable.  He presents a thorough analysis of stock market data showing that stocks returned about 7% above inflation for the past two hundred years, and that for twenty year time frames, stocks outperformed bonds over 90% of the time --- Some Things Are Probable.

 

What does history tell us about what is possible and what is probable?

When you take a look at market total returns from 1926 – 2005, you will see  what is possible and what is probable when you invest in the market.  First, what is possible --- The Best Year --- in 1935, stocks returned 60.0%, bonds returned 42.1% and T-Bills returned 14.0%.  But, you will also find that it is also possible to lose big time in the worst year --- stocks lost 41.1 in 1931 --- bonds lost 8.7% in 1999 and T-Bills had a return of 0.0%.  How about average over that period--- stocks returns 12.7% ---bonds returned 5.8% and T-Bills returned 3.8%.  -

 

 Quote Of The Month

History tells us that stocks have typically performed very well when the country comes out of a recession. Since 1953, there have been nine recessions, lasting an average of 11 months. On average, the stock market (based on returns of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index) gained 36 percent from the low point of the recession to six months after the recession ended.

The current recession is in its 13th month, already longer than average. While we can predict neither the length of this recession nor the short-term movement of stock prices, stocks have risen from their lows. Since reaching a low on November 20, 2008, the S&P 500 increased 15.6 percent through December 29,2008.”  FundAdvice.com 12/30/2008

 

Copyright © 2008 Retirement Planning Associates  |    Site Map  |  Contact Us